Because I read RoddyDoyle's novel, “The Dead Republic,” in which John Ford appears as
a significant, fictionalized character, I became more interested in
John Ford than in Doyle's novel (a disappointment). I watched“Directed by John Ford,” a tribute to him by Peter Bogdanovich,
made in 1971, which explains why other important movie directors
admired Ford so much. My curiosity was aroused even further, so I
decided to download one of his movies and see why people like
Scorcese and Spielberg thought so highly of him.
I chose “The ManWho Shot Liberty Valence” mainly because I have always liked Jimmy
Stewart (a fellow graduate of Princeton, after all) as much as I
have disliked John Wayne.
Some movies made in
1962 (when I graduated high school) are extremely dated, and “The
Man Who Shot Liberty Valence” is a prime example. The characters
lack depth. The plot is stupid. The moral issues are clichés.
The scenery and the sets are patently artificial. But I watched it to
the end and enjoyed it – possibly because it made me realize how
much things have changed in the ensuing years. I also wanted to see
how ridiculous John Wayne and Any Devine could get, as well as the
exaggerated drunks – funny alcoholics.
John Wayne plays a
soft-hearted tough guy, and Jimmy Stewart plays a brave wimp, whose
successful political career is based on his fame as the man who
killed Liberty Valence, Lee Marvin. The bad guy is a mild villain
compared to sadists I have seen on the screen in the past decades.
But you can tell that Marvin was having fun playing him, whereas
Jimmy Stewart seemed mildly embarrassed throughout film, and John
Wayne didn't even try to act. The female lead, Vera Miles, was told
twice by John Wayne that she looked pretty when she was mad, and she
didn't even shoot him.
The explicit
political message is democratic: people are created equal (even John
Wayne's loyal, black hired man), and citizens can successfully
mobilize, vote, and defeat powerful and unscrupulous special
interests (farmers against cattle ranchers). Nor is the West
lily-white. In a brief, unbelievable schoolroom scene, the brightest
pupil is a Mexican-American girl, and, later, John Wayne almost forces the
bartender to serve his African-American sidekick (played by Woody
Strode).
However, if I got it
right, the implicit political message verges on fascistic: you'd
better have a gun, a real man risks his life (Jimmy Stewart confronts
Lee Marvin, who is a far superior gunman), and political success is
based on a lie (John Wayne really killed Lee Marvin). The West is
where men can (and have to) be men.
If you missed “The
Man Who Shot Liberty Valence” back in 1962, don't bother watching
it now. However, I did see why directors admire Ford's directing, the
way he used scenery, the way he managed crowd scenes, and the way he
got actors to seem natural even in preposterous situations. He
clearly had a deep grasp of what the cinema is and can be. He also
had a naïve idea about American greatness that leads only to the
political nightmare we are living in now.
No comments:
Post a Comment